In the context of controlled substances, which action is NOT acceptable?

In the context of controlled substances, maintaining accurate and unambiguous records is crucial due to the legal regulations surrounding these drugs. Using an eraser to correct a mistake is considered unacceptable because it can create a possibility of tampering or altering the original documentation. This can lead to confusion, potential misuse of the substance, and legal implications for a veterinary practice.

In contrast, drawing a line through a misspelled word and initialing the correction maintains a clear audit trail, showing that an error was made and corrected transparently. Making a correction next to the error similarly maintains clarity and legality in documentation. Submitting a new form for the order is also acceptable, as it offers a fresh, clear record without ambiguity. Each of these options adheres to principles of accountability and integrity in pharmacological practices, which are vital in dealing with controlled substances.